UAS as a disruptive technology
4 min to read

UAS as a disruptive technology

Date
15 June 2018

It has been clear for some time that unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) (otherwise known as ‘drones’) have the potential to disrupt a number of markets.

For some markets, this is already happening. For instance, the effective, quick and comprehensive data capture services offered by UAS operators are beginning to change the way that infrastructure is being maintained. A drone can be flown comparatively cheaply and efficiently over a solar farm, wind farm or oil rig with the data collected quickly delivered to the customer’s desktop via an online portal.

To date, it is the markets that lend themselves to lower risk UAS operations that have supported this kind of wider scale UAS market entry. A survey of a wind farm, for instance, can ordinarily be undertaken within line of sight of the UAS pilot and without flying over uninvolved members of the public.

However, much of the excitement about the potential future of commercial UAS concerns riskier operations. For instance, Amazon has for some time been exploring the potential for using UAS to deliver its products to its customer’s doorsteps. Likewise, a recent Highways England report considers how UAS could be utilised to keep roads moving by collecting and reporting data on accidents.

Both of these examples would require UAS to be flown over uninvolved members of the public and almost certainly beyond line of sight. Though a great example of the capability of UAS, it is telling that Amazon’s trial Prime Air drone delivery (at the end of 2016) involved delivery to a customer in close proximity to the Amazon depot, with a substantial garden and requiring items weighing less than 2.6kg. Put simply, for riskier operations such as these to become a reality, the regulatory framework will require careful navigation, as will the associated privacy issues.

An overview of the privacy and regulatory implications of UAS can be found here.

Until now, conventional aviation regulation has not lent itself well to exploiting the full commercial potential of UAS. This is in part due to the inherent difficulty in striking the right balance between approving operations and ensuring public safety and privacy. However, the good news is that lawmakers appear to appreciate the opportunities and difficulties inherent in UAS operations. At EU level, the UAS regulatory framework is evolving, with one of the key aims being to “foster the development of the UAS market”.

In May last year, we had the publication by the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) of the Notice of Proposed Amendment 2017-05 (NPA) (for more details, see our Article: The legal and regulatory challenges facing the UAS market).

On 6 February this year, EASA published Opinion No 01/2018, attaching an updated draft regulation designed to govern the operation of UAS within Member States. More recently, further revised drafts have become available.

At a high level, the draft EU framework sets out three categories of UAS operations: ‘open’ (low risk), ‘specific’ (medium risk) and ‘certified’ (high risk) and retains the scope for operators performing low risk operations to commence without a specific operation-by-operation consent.

Perhaps more interestingly, however, it also seeks to provide UAS operators with a more efficient route to obtaining consent for medium risk operations based on a set of ‘standard scenarios’. If an operation falls within the parameters of a standard scenario, the UAS operator will be able to proceed on the basis of a simple operational declaration.

Even if the operation doesn’t fall within such parameters, a UAS operator may still be able to obtain approval provided that it can convince the regulator that the level of risk is appropriate through a bespoke risk assessment. This could, for instance, act as an enabler for, amongst other things, beyond line of sight operations or the use of high level platforms performing the functions of a satellite.

Going a step further, the draft EU framework envisages that a UAS operator may, where it has appropriate systems and safeguards in place, be awarded a limited right to authorise its own medium risk operations.

The EU framework is in draft form at this stage and, notably, no ‘standard scenarios’ have yet been published. It does though seem clear that the direction of travel is a drive to unlock the use of UAS for the types of medium risk operations that could truly lead to wide scale market disruption. This is certainly an area to keep an eye on.

Share
Written by
Ben Woodfield
Ben Woodfield
Ben is an associate in Bird & Bird's London-based Commercial Group. Ben has a particular focus on major projects, primarily in the IT, healthcare and defence sectors.
Related articles
PODCAST - Demystifying Intellectual Property and NFTs (Non Fungible Tokens)
1 min to read
11 June 2021
PODCAST – Demystifying Intellectual Property and NFTs (Non Fungible Tokens)
2021 has been the year Non Fungible Tokens (NFTs) have entered the public conscious, with the mainstream media highlighting a range of high profile NFTs being purchased for substantial sums. Rebecca...
Digital Compass: EU outlines its digital ambitions for 2030
1 min to read
18 May 2021
Digital Compass: EU outlines its digital ambitions for 2030
The Commission recently presented a vision for Europe’s digital transformation by 2030 which revolves around four main pillars: skills, government, infrastructure and business. These four areas are part...
Recent initiatives impacting the digital sector
Recent initiatives impacting the digital sector
Recent months have seen a veritable flurry of legislative, regulatory and soft law initiatives and proposals. The measures often tackle similar sectors – all things digital often being in the eye of the...
The EU considers allowing collective bargaining for gig workers
4 min to read
09 March 2021
The EU considers allowing collective bargaining for gig workers
Over the past years, the EU institutions have shown quite some attention to the position of workers in the so-called gig or peer economy, despite the limited legislative authority of the EU in the area...
Cookies
We use analytics cookies to help us understand if our website is working well and to learn what content is most useful to visitors. We also use some cookies which are essential to make our website work. You can accept or reject our analytic cookies (including the collection of associated data) and change your mind at any time. Find out more in our Cookie Notice.