When AI is too smart – Digital platform facilitated price collusion
3 min to read

When AI is too smart – Digital platform facilitated price collusion

Date
23 August 2021

The digital platform Ageras A/S (“Ageras”) is a bidding platform which facilitates contact between providers of accounting and bookkeeping services and potential customers. The platform operated with an automatised price standardisation mechanism, in which providers who were bidding for tasks were given an automatic notification, along with the option to adjust the price of their offer, if the offered price was below Ageras’ estimated market price.

The estimated market price was inter alia based on Ageras’ knowledge of the customer’s budget for the assignment and was only visible if the offered price was below this estimated price. The notification appeared, in form of a pop-up window, prior to submitting the offer and informed the provider:

  • That the provider’s offer was below the estimated market price.
  • That the required service fee would be 30% of the estimated price if the provider decided to continue with the lower price, rather than 30% of the winning offer, as stated in Ageras’ terms and conditions, and
  • That the provider could choose to adjust the offer before submitting it to the customer.

The Danish Competition Authority (“DCCA”) concluded that the applied automatised price standardisation mechanism functioned as a signal and a guide, which reduced the uncertainty for the providers on the platform.

Furthermore, Ageras had in several cases informed (by written and telephonic communication) not only the bidding providers, but all providers about the so-called minimum quotes for specific types of assignments ahead of the bidding process, and specifically asked providers on their platform to increase their prices.

Both types of conduct were therefore found to have as their object to coordinate the prices on the relevant market by a systematic standardisation of price, even though the information was not exchanged horizontally, but instead via the platform. The DCCA therefore found that the conduct infringed Article 101(1) TFEU and article 6 in the Danish Competition Act.

Moreover, the effect of this conduct was proven, as it was found, that in a large number of cases the offers on the platform differed less than 1% of the estimated market price.

In June 2020, the DCCA decided to report the case to the State Prosecutor of Serious Economic and International Crime for a criminal prosecution, which lead to the acceptance of the fine on the 9th July 2021.

For more information, please refer to the decision of 30th June 2021 from the Danish Competition and Consumer Authority in Danish here.

For more information please contact Morten Nissen or Alexander Brøchner.

Share
Written by
Morten Nissen
Morten Nissen
Denmark
I'm a partner and co-head of our international Competition & EU group. I also lead the Competition & EU team in Denmark. I have a particular focus on applying competition & EU law as a tool to achieve specific and measurable business objectives for our clients.
View profile
Alexander Brochner
Alexander Brochner
Denmark
I'm an associate in our international Competition & EU group in Denmark, advising both national and international clients on Danish and EU competition law.
View profile
Related articles
Digital dispute resolution rules to facilitate rapid and cost-effective resolution of disputes involving novel digital technologies
Digital dispute resolution rules to facilitate rapid and cost-effective resolution of disputes involving novel digital technologies
While some saw the development of products using blockchain technology leading to the demise of disputes, the reality is that disputes in the arena of digital technology are increasing in number. Lawtech’s...
Technology Projects: Managing the Risks of Innovation and Change Part 2: During the Life of the Project
Technology Projects: Managing the Risks of Innovation and Change Part 2: During the Life of the Project
Customers in long-term technology projects can find that while they have been working towards their chosen solution a more advanced, cheaper, or simply more desirable technology has become available....
The UK as a global AI superpower
4 min to read
27 October 2021
The UK as a global AI superpower
On 22 September 2021, during the third day of London Tech Week, the UK Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport published its first National AI Strategy, detailing its 10-year plan to position...
Technology Projects: Managing the Risks of Innovation and Change
Technology Projects: Managing the Risks of Innovation and Change
Customers in long-term technology projects can find that while they have been working towards their chosen solution, a more advanced, cheaper, or simply more desirable technology has become available....
Cookies
We use analytics cookies to help us understand if our website is working well and to learn what content is most useful to visitors. We also use some cookies which are essential to make our website work. You can accept or reject our analytic cookies (including the collection of associated data) and change your mind at any time. Find out more in our Cookie Notice.